Workshop: Zero carbon schools
Zero carbon schools
A workshop to explore the technological feasibility and commercial viability
University of Reading
- 21 January 2009 –
Attendance: 35 persons as per list
Background
The Government’s renewable energy strategy includes an ambition for all new school buildings from 2016 onwards to be zero carbon. This will involve a major step change in design from existing school buildings most of which date back to the late ‘50s and early ‘60s when a low environmental footprint was not part of the design brief. For many secondary schools in Reading such as Reading Girls School, Prospect and Kendrick, rebuilding rather than refurbishing is the only viable solution for stock about 50 years old
This one day workshop considered our current state of knowledge and what has been achieved in three recent low energy buildings in Reading namely the Students Services building (SSB) at UoR, Special Needs school at Meadway (SNS) and the 6th form provision at Reading Girls School (RGS) and an outline study for rebuilding the general teaching block (GTB) at Reading Girls School. It then proceeded to consider what steps remained to achieve zero carbon.
Goals
MM outlined the desire of Reading Borough Council (RBC) to take a progressive approach towards reaching zero carbon. A large amount of work would be required in a short period of time if approval was given for an early draw down of funds from the primary capital programme. Any future buildings should reflect the importance that RBC attached towards reaching the zero carbon goal in a cost effective manner.
SSB, UoR
KL described the design approach for this 2300 m2 student services building. Design features included –
| Very well insulated box Large windows to capture day light Top/bottom openings to encourage natural ventilation Underfloor heating to maximise use of available space Open floor planning where possible Ground coupled heat pump (GCHP) with no back up boiler |
LM described the design features of the GC heat pump system
| 25 boreholes, 100m deep Pipes coupled together through header located near surface 2 90 kW Geothermal International heat pumps capable of providing space heating or cooling Compact plant room Uncluttered roof |
A visit was made to the building when the outside temperature was +2C yet the heating was off because the internal gains were offsetting the heat loss through the fabric. The system had performed very well for 15 months with only one of the heat pumps required at any one time to provide heating. The other could therefore be used to provide cooing when required for the two presentation rooms.
SNS, Meadway
AJ described the design brief and the architectural solutions for this special needs school of 12000 m2 which had in a period of 3 months increased the number of pupils from 47 to 93. These included -
| Arc of classrooms south facing Large windows with controlled openings front and back Sloping roof Acoustic damping materials on all reflective surfaces Controlled shading to limit sunlight Maximise use of day lighting Big open spaces for communal activities all on single floor with no step All spaces under one roof Minimise loss of curriculum time due to movement Controlled environment with actuator mounted roof vents |
DP described the provision of the services and the use of renewable energy sources –
| Two 90 kW GCHP supplied by Geothermal International to supply space heating and cooling when required Top up boiler condensing gas 65 kW Renewable electricity from roof mounted wind turbines and photovoltaic arrays (PV) Hot water ring main supplied by top up boiler Small CHP plant to provide hot water for thermal pool |
Initial experiences had been very good and building was meeting expectations.
6th form provision, RGS
SW described the design brief for this building which was on a small site squeezed between existing buildings and Northumbria Avenue so orientation was fixed. This included –
| Minimise use of energy Enhance natural ventilation Maximise use of day light Large windows low E Lighting controlled by sensors Renewable electricity PV arrays orientated south to maximise light capture Low maintenance |
Building still under construction with occupation due in autumn.
GTB, RGS
RM outlined the design concept for a general teaching block of 18 classrooms, single storey, south facing linked by north facing corridor. Design features copied those of SSB and SNS in that –
| Sloping roof, high ceiling following roof line large windows with openings top and bottom south facing smaller clestory windows to north passive shading to minimise summer gain including use of deciduous trees maximise use of day lighting with light pipes to fill back of class room use only natural ventilation underfloor heating
|
Renewable energy would be provided by a combination -
| Water coupled heat pumps backed by an artificial lake PV array mounted directly on pitched roof which could be extended as costs decreased 100 kW wind turbines |
Zero carbon could be achieved by exporting renewable heating and electricity to the surrounding houses when not required by school and importing when school could not meet its requirements.
Steps to zero carbon
Following a discussion in smaller groups, the following were agreed –
· monitoring renewable energy production and consumption in the 3 buildings discussed at workshop
· deciding whether how energy usage could be further minimised
· monitor reliability and availability of GCHP to determine need for any back up boiler
·
· investigate advantages and disadvantages of south facing classrooms
· optimise balance between insulation level and internal heat gains
· optimise ways of building RES into building fabric
·
· develop criteria for psychological well being in classrooms
· develop ways of monitoring carbon account of school
· collecting and reusing rain water
· sufficient time to think design through
Way forward
There was a lot of work that needed to be done quickly to get to zero carbon buildings.
It required close collaboration between architects, service providers, renewable energy suppliers and researchers like at the School for Construction Management and Engineering at UoR.
It was worth considering setting up a zero carbon network to maintain contact and share experiences and use the opportunity of any new BSF funding to take the next steps to zero carbon. A method for funding the zero carbon research should be sought.
Rayner Mayer
SVRF, SCME
UoR
Participants Myles Milner Reading Borough CouncilCharles Ainslie Reading Girls School Kieran Lilly Stride TreyhanBrian Lacey HalcrowyollesAlan Johnson Hunters and partnersNeil Champion Pope ConsultingDerrick PopeSimon Waite Hampshire Architects Department Neil Boardman Paul Chandler Lee Marshall Geothermal International Frank Mills SKMPaul Wale Colin Barwick FMD, University of Reading (UoR)Nigel Hodgson Hazim Awbi SCME, UoR Derek Clemence CroombeGeoff CookJennifer WhyteMohammed Alshitawi Pam Lewis SCME/SCPRosario NobileRayner MayerChristina Bristow John Oversby IOE, UoRKendra Gittus BUD, UoR Nigel Hartley Apologies
Patrick Bateman National Energy Foundation
Howard Hughes Oxfordshire County Architects
Richard Gooden Hampshire County ArchitectsLATEST NEWS
-
17
Oct
Was it the bankers, the builder, the facility manager or the government? The anatomy of a public private partnership dispute
BARTLETT SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND CIBSE SCHOOL DESIGN GROUP request the pleasure of your company to a... »
-
09
Oct
NEW: DESIGNING FOR EDUCATION
OECD Centre for Effective Learning Environments (CELE) promotes the exchange and analysis of policy, research and experience in... »
-
02
Aug
COMING SOON!!! School Design Group Bulletin No. 4
The new issue of the School Design Group Bulletin No. 4 will be published in September 2011. This issue is... »

